nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:32:00 -0400
Howdy all, Somewhere in this thread there is the issue of description of data collection practices, and for those mammals who care (see "Ice Age" with someone under 10 if you need help decoding that), you can do the following: Review the latest working draft (4 January 2005) of the P3P Spec http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-P3P11-20050104/Overview.html and send issues to public-p3p-spec () w3 org and/or post to Bugzilla http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/ The activity you'll be assisting is getting P3P 1.1 to (W3C) last call. Like all IMF work, its unpaid, and in the event of capture, the Secretary will disavow ... Eric
Current thread:
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000, (continued)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Michael . Dillon (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jay R. Ashworth (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Jon Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Florian Weimer (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Bob Vaughan (May 27)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Nicole (May 31)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Stephen Sprunk (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Daniel Golding (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Edward Lewis (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Joel Jaeggli (May 26)
- Re: Stanford Hack Exposes 10,000 Adam McKenna (May 25)