nanog mailing list archives
Re: Underscores in host names
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall () ehsco com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:53:02 -0400
Edward Lewis wrote:
It's true that the xn-- convention isn't the best way to encode IDN's, but it has proven to be the optimal one in design (at least).
It's the necessary minimum for compatibilty purposes, but not anywhere near the optimal design. Moreover, those have nothing to do with each other. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
Current thread:
- Re: Underscores in host names, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Underscores in host names Jay R. Ashworth (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Roger Marquis (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Roger Marquis (May 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Underscores in host names Jay R. Ashworth (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Edward Lewis (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Michael . Dillon (May 20)
- Re: Underscores in host names alex (May 20)
- Re: Underscores in host names william(at)elan.net (May 20)
- Re: Underscores in host names Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Underscores in host names Edward Lewis (May 19)