nanog mailing list archives
Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services
From: Bruce Pinsky <bep () whack org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:23:37 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote: | | Yep: | | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050519/ap_on_hi_te/911_internet_phones | That last part ought to be interesting to try and implement in 120 days: "...must provide the emergency operator with the customer's callback number and location, regardless of whether the call is being made from the customer's home or elsewhere." So what's the local 911 center I should be routed to when I'm at the Cebu Phillipines airport and making a VoIP call? - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCjNmpE1XcgMgrtyYRAmGxAJ9mSpa/nlzPFIWUlcb+bir4X/Vi2QCdGBU/ BqqsjKTF1Z6spxpWaON4Qqs= =6c+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (May 19)
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Bruce Pinsky (May 19)
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Jason Frisvold (May 19)
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Nathan Allen Stratton (May 19)
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Jason Frisvold (May 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Robert Bonomi (May 19)
- Re: VoIP operators given 120-day deadline to implement E911 services Bruce Pinsky (May 19)