nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 11 May 2005, MARLON BORBA wrote:
<evil grin> if you are sure there are no more infected machines out there... </evil grin>
There will always be infected machines out there. The question is, are there infectable machines on your network, and will your network contain them or melt down if you allow them to get infected? sql slammer must have been a huge money maker for cisco and other switch vendors (any that support per-port rate-limiting or policing) as networks scrambled to upgrade infrastructure to contain the next similar outbreak rather than melt under the load. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434, (continued)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Hank Nussbacher (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Joe Maimon (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Gadi Evron (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Brian Russo (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Brian Russo (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 John Kristoff (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Jeff Kell (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 MARLON BORBA (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Jon Lewis (May 11)
- Re: Blocking port udp/tcp 1433/1434 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (May 11)