nanog mailing list archives
RE: DOS attack tracing
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 07:44:24 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Kim Onnel Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:19 AM To: Scott Weeks Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: DOS attack tracing 1) Get 'Cisco guard' , too expensive ? 2) Get Arbor, Stealthflow, Esphion, too expensive ?
Good advice when DDOS' are constant. If this was a first and possibly last for awhile, it may make sense to rely on the software tools and a good 'SOP' with the provider instead. It really depends on the scope of the problem in particular. DDOS' is rather infrequent to zero for most enterprises. That DDOS golden banana is rather yummy with sprinkles on top. Don't get me wrong, the DDOS problem is real, but not for everyone, and not as frequently as it's being hyped up to be. A managed service is a better way to go if they're worried, IMO. [ SNIP ]
Current thread:
- Re: DOS attack tracing, (continued)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Richard A Steenbergen (May 09)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Scott Weeks (May 09)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Will Yardley (May 09)
- RE: DOS attack tracing Richard (May 09)
- RE: DOS attack tracing Scott Weeks (May 09)
- RE: DOS attack tracing Steve Gibbard (May 09)
- RE: DOS attack tracing Scott Weeks (May 09)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Kim Onnel (May 10)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 10)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Scott Weeks (May 10)
- RE: DOS attack tracing Richard (May 09)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 10)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Gadi Evron (May 10)
- Re: DOS attack tracing Elmar K. Bins (May 10)