nanog mailing list archives

Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure


From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:08:08 +0200


* Arnold Nipper:

On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wrote

Anyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many
aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.

But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric.

Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased.  Or Telcordia compared
apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).

As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...

I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so
this isn't convincing.


Current thread: