nanog mailing list archives
Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:08:08 +0200
* Arnold Nipper:
On 31.03.2005 22:36 Florian Weimer wroteAnyway, DENIC's offer didn't match that of Sentan or Verisign in many aspects, so it's a non-issue in the end.But only if you judge according to Telcordia's metric.
Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's 200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).
As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...
I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so this isn't convincing.
Current thread:
- Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Paul Vixie (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- report of .biz outage... Edward Lewis (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Arnold Nipper (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Florian Weimer (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Bill Woodcock (Mar 31)
- Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net Procedure Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Mar 31)