nanog mailing list archives
Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:26:17 GMT
Completely agree with [1] "...deploying faster than..", and [2] "...suggest we work on what it needs to be better...". Additionally, it would be also be wonderful if the nasty business of VoIP service providers playing both sides of the current regulatory issues (or lack thereof, or both) didn't come into play, but I guess you can't win 'em all. - ferg -- Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote: so, i am sure it does not meet everyone's needs, seems poor quality to some, ... but it's deploying at least a decimal order of magnitude faster than ipv6. so, rather than pretend it sucks so badly it can be ignored, i suggest we work on what it needs to be better and to scale really well. randy -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
Current thread:
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance, (continued)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 31)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Randy Bush (Mar 31)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Lucy E. Lynch (Mar 31)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jaap Akkerhuis (Mar 31)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Mar 31)
- Message not available
- RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance ehall (Mar 31)