nanog mailing list archives

Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance


From: Bill Nash <billn () billn net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:

| to bear the additional cost of my customers choosing to use a
| competitor's VOIP service over my own, says Greg Boehnlein, who
| operates Cleveland, Ohio-based ISP N2Net.
|
| Without control of the last mile, we're screwed, Boehnlein says,
| which is why I can identify with Clearwire's decision and say
| more power to them.

Do you also block NNTP so that customers have to use your servers?

And if some other service used higher cumulative bandwidth than VoIP (say,
Apple's music service) and didn't ~reimburse you for the use of your
network, would|do you block that service too? For that matter, do you
block the various P2P systems that don't make money but that generate
massive traffic?


I find this to be entertaining, since as a VOIP consumer, I'm reimbursing my ISP for the cost of the traffic as part of my monthly tithe. Why exactly are networks taking this stance to QoS VOIP traffic, generated by their customers, into uselessness?

This will all be especially hysterical when it's done by an ISP that comprises 100% of it's local market's internet connectivity. Munn vs. Illinois, round 2!

- billn


Current thread: