nanog mailing list archives
Re: Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:21:00 -0800
forget this concept of tier1, 2, 3 .. they are little more than terms used by salesmen.
at least t1 and t2, also permeate academic papers where the real topology is actually measured. but we should not let demonstrable measurements get in the way of our defense of the position of our smaller networks by marketing people. randy
Current thread:
- Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming] G Pavan Kumar (Mar 26)
- Re: Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming] Michael Loftis (Mar 26)
- Re: Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming] Randy Bush (Mar 26)
- T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 27)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 27)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Randy Bush (Mar 27)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Alex Bligh (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Randy Bush (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] John Dupuy (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]] Patrick W Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Apology: [Re: Tier-2 reachability and multihoming] Randy Bush (Mar 26)