nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005


From: "james edwards" <hackerwacker () cybermesa com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:34:30 -0700


As long as they have a /24 that they can announce, two or more upstreams
that are able and willing to establish BGP sessions with them and a router
with enough memory to hold at least 2 full views (for a Cisco, you
probably want 256MB or more these days), they can multi (or dual) home.


They many not need anything near 2 full tables. A default plus providers own
and customer routes
could do, and would require less memory/smaller router.

James H. Edwards
Routing and Security Administrator
At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
jamesh () cybermesa com  noc () cybermesa com
http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM
(505) 795-7101


Current thread: