nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005
From: "james edwards" <hackerwacker () cybermesa com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:34:30 -0700
As long as they have a /24 that they can announce, two or more upstreams that are able and willing to establish BGP sessions with them and a router with enough memory to hold at least 2 full views (for a Cisco, you probably want 256MB or more these days), they can multi (or dual) home.
They many not need anything near 2 full tables. A default plus providers own and customer routes could do, and would require less memory/smaller router. James H. Edwards Routing and Security Administrator At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa jamesh () cybermesa com noc () cybermesa com http://www.cybermesa.com/ContactCM (505) 795-7101
Current thread:
- Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005 Geoff White (Feb 28)
- Re: Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005 Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005 up (Mar 01)
- Re: Multihoming for the small ISP ( search engine) ala 2005 james edwards (Mar 01)