nanog mailing list archives
Re: sorbs.net
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:05:21 -0500
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:44:41PM -0500, Paul G wrote:
unfortunately, that *still* didn't stop people from using it, which translated into an unresolvable headache for me as a sp.
Then gripe at the people who chose to use it: it was *their* decision, and if it was a poor one, then they are the people who need to be held accountable for it. Look, if I want to publish a blocklist of all domains with the string "er" in them and all IP addresses ending in .7, that would be a silly thing to do: but after all, it's just a list. It doesn't _do_ anything until someone decides to use it for some purpose. And if they're insane enough to do so, well, <shrug>, so be it. It's their system/network; they're free to decline any inbound traffic they don't wish to receive. And you, and I, and everyone else who's not on their system/network, don't get a vote. ---Rsk
Current thread:
- Re: sorbs.net, (continued)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay Hennigan (Mar 16)
- Re: sorbs.net Bruce Campbell (Mar 15)
- RE: sorbs.net David Schwartz (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Matthew Sullivan (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Robert Bonomi (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Paul G (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Rich Kulawiec (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Jason Slagle (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 21)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Michael . Dillon (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Randy Bush (Mar 15)
- Re: sorbs.net Wes Hardaker (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 22)
- Re: sorbs.net Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 22)