nanog mailing list archives

Re: sorbs.net


From: Steve Gibbard <scg () gibbard org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:05:51 -0800 (PST)


This is straying a bit far from network operations, and would probably be
better discussed elsewhere.

-Steve

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Dave Dennis wrote:


On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Micah McNelly wrote:


Actually I got a response quickly from a list member who represent sorbs
at some level.  Do you really think opinion has a place in mail
delivery?  What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was
suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown away)?

/m


Well, anyone remember the Comstock Act?

But seriously, the analogy here is a bit false.  It would be like
the recipient of the mail signed up to use a service that inspected
their mail for them, and made the decisions you are describing.

You can argue that signing up for such a service is silly, wrong headed,
ill informed and results in unintended consequences.  But you cannot argue
that it is government censorship.

+-------------------------
+ Dave Dennis
+ Seattle, WA
+ dmd () speakeasy org
+ http://www.dmdennis.com
+-------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Gibbard                           scg () gibbard org
+1 415 717-7842 (cell)                  http://www.gibbard.org/~scg
+1 510 528-1035 (home)


Current thread: