nanog mailing list archives
Re: nanog
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:07:16 -0500
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:38:30PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:28 PM -0500 "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:But note that the OP does not have a MOV issue; he has an inspector issue. His best answer there may be buying outlet strips that offer no surge protection. He likely will need to first pin the inspector down on what rules he's allegely broken, however.This is the most cogent point to date, and the one I made off list: ask him to quote chapter and verse.Yeah, I am waiting on the exact code violation to come down. FWIW the overall consent from various fire marshalls is 'yes, it's fine' but some had misgivings about it. understandable, and strictly according to atleast one rule book it isn't allowed.
At which point two questions arise: 1) is that 'rulebook' controlling by law, and if so, where does that delegation of authority happen in statute, and 2) what will your *fire insurer* think about it even if it is legal? Cheers, -- jr 'IANAL:IJPOOTI' a -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system adminstrator. Or two. --me
Current thread:
- Fire Code/UFC Regs? Michael Loftis (Mar 11)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? David Lesher (Mar 11)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Josh Vince (Mar 13)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Joe Maimon (Mar 13)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Mark Radabaugh (Mar 13)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Dan Hollis (Mar 14)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Douglas Otis (Mar 15)
- Re: Fire Code/UFC Regs? Joe Maimon (Mar 13)
- nanog David Lesher (Mar 13)
- Message not available
- Re: nanog Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 13)
- Re: nanog Michael Loftis (Mar 13)
- Message not available
- Re: nanog Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: nanog [really inspectors & MOV's] David Lesher (Mar 13)