nanog mailing list archives
Re: public accessible snmp devices?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:09:54 +0200
Jim Popovitch wrote:
That would be no on both counts. All packets got replies and while debugging the polling interval was fairly short. (on order of seconds) so restart would be out of question and it repeated frequently enough not to be a failover either.Was the device restarted? Was the polled interface so overloaded that UDP was dropped and your tool/application just happened to show a zero instead?
Pete
Current thread:
- public accessible snmp devices? Vicky Rode (Mar 03)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? JC Dill (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Jim Popovitch (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Petri Helenius (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 07)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? Alexei Roudnev (Mar 06)
- Re: public accessible snmp devices? vijay gill (Mar 07)