RE: More on Vonage service disruptions...

[Greg Boehnlein <damin () nacs net>]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:

> Ah, and therein lies the rub.
>
> Any sort of QoS frob that is implemented for VoIP
> (or any other traffic for that matter) _must_ be
> truly honored end-to-end, and at every intermediate
> hop in between, for it to be "guaranteed"  -- otherwise
> when traffic that you may designate as "higher quality"
> is handed off to another administrative domain that
> does not honor your traffic classifications, all bets
> are off.
>
> If you do not "own" the end-to-end network
> infrastructure, there is no way to guarantee any
> preferential handling of any particular subset of
> traffic.

So, set your Rate-Limiting of SIP traffic to 1 packet per second for the 
network that YOU control and then offer your VoIP subscribers a different 
QOS profile at a higher cost.

Bingo, problem solved. The economy will work itself out.

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST