nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL scomp
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:41:46 +0530
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:15:51 -0500 (EST), Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> wrote:
Your third option is best. (Excuse the signature-pun. :) SRS does not require SPF, and provides auditability for forwarded mail: http://spf.pobox.com/srs.html
In which case dont futz about with SES (thats yet another name for SRS i think, I prefer to think I'm the only SRS around) - use BATV instead. Its specced for exactly what #3 says. srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: AOL scomp Jim Segrave (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Vinny Abello (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Todd Vierling (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Vinny Abello (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Chris Adams (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Barry Shein (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Jim Segrave (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Gary E. Miller (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp David Lesher (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AOL scomp John Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Gregory Hicks (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Mar 02)