nanog mailing list archives
Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:52:27 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Perhaps a simpler way is to announce your entire allocation and put no-export on things you want to come in your other provider? ^1239$
or perhaps 'no-advertise' and send the same length prefixes everywhere... this IS headed down the 1000 ways to config bgp though :(
Current thread:
- URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? will (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Pete Templin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Maimon (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Stephen Stuart (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? christian . macnevin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 03)
- RE: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Olsen, Jason (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? christian . macnevin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Abley (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Joe Maimon (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Pete Templin (Jun 03)
- Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers? Andre Oppermann (Jun 03)