nanog mailing list archives
Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
When people start to talk about blocking, just say no.It took our politicians in Sweden approx one month to start trying to extend the child porn filtering some large ISPs agreed to implement, to also include trafficking and prostitution advertising.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking W. Mark Herrick, Jr. (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Sean Donelan (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 28)
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Aaron Glenn (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Frank Coluccio (Jun 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 28)
- Message not available