nanog mailing list archives

Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS


From: Abhishek Verma <abhishekv.verma () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:42:04 +0530


Hi Manav,

Excellent Document!

I see that this document has expired. Are you folks thinking of
respinning a copy of this draft?

Thanks,
Abhishek

On 6/23/05, Manav Bhatia <manav () riverstonenet com> wrote:

Hi Daniel,

We wrote a draft some time back comparing the two protocols ISIS and OSPF.
It should address some of your doubts and concerns.

Here's a pointer to my local copy:

http://geocities.com/mnvbhatia/draft-bhatia-manral-diff-isis-ospf-00.txt

Thanks,
Manav

!> -----Original Message-----
!> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]
!> On Behalf Of Dan Evans
!> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:35 PM
!> To: nanog () merit edu
!> Subject: OSPF -vs- ISIS
!>
!>
!> All,
!>
!> Can anyone point me to information on what the top N service
!> providers
!> are using for their IGP? I'm trying to build a case for
!> switching from
!> OSPF to IS-IS. Those on this list who are currently running IS-IS, do
!> you find better scalability and stability running IS-IS than OSPF? I
!> understand that this question is a lot more complex than a simple yes
!> or no since factors like design and routing policy will certainly
!> affect the protocols behavior.
!>
!> Any insights or experiences that you can share would be most helpful.
!>
!> Thanks,
!>
!> Daniel Evans
!> Alltel Communications
!>
!>





-- 

--
Class of 2004
Institute of Technology, BHU
Varanasi, India


Current thread: