nanog mailing list archives

Re: Localized mail servers, global scope


From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:57:52 +0100


On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

The problem he's going to hit is that he wants *my* mail server to send mail to
'fred () example com' to get routed to the MX in San Fran where Fred is, and *my*
mail server to send mail 'johann () example com' to get routed to the MX in Geneva
where Johann is, and avoid having a central MX that then does routing.

You don't need a central MX if each site MTA knows which users are at
which sites. Incoming email may have to take an extra hop if it comes in
to the wrong site, but that's a consequence of the specification that no
implementation can fix.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.


Current thread: