nanog mailing list archives
Re: More long AS-sets announced
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:54:55 +0100
Thank you. You've provided a clean, concise counter to Lorenzo's original claim that long AS sets won't trip on IOS bugs.
no problem. you're quite welcome.
This may be a well-run, very small experiment, but it's experimenting with a space that's rarely explored and therefore less likely to have encountered the same level of operational testing that horrifying garbage leaks have tested. As such, I'm frustrated that the testers consider requests to provide more advance notice to be so "obtuse".
could you please give me the command to configure ios to not crash if given advance notice?
Why is this operational test supposed to be given freer reign on the 'net than our own operations? Alternatively, why can't the test be conducted in a lab, with interested operators providing router configurations and xOS versions to give the test bed the most realistic sample of the 'net, without using the production 'net?
the first announcement of this experiment was months ago. randy
Current thread:
- Re: More long AS-sets announced, (continued)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jerry Pasker (Jun 20)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced MarcoH (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Pete Templin (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Bruce Campbell (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Tony Li (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Jon Lewis (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Randy Bush (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Pete Templin (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Michael . Dillon (Jun 22)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Edward B. Dreger (Jun 21)
- Re: More long AS-sets announced Pete Templin (Jun 21)