nanog mailing list archives
RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:13:17 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: vijay gill [mailto:vgill () vijaygill com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 9:06 PM To: Hannigan, Martin Cc: Daniel Golding; nanog () merit edu; nanog-support () merit edu Subject: Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin wrote:It shouldn't be complicated. I think "members" are looking for Operator experience. I don't think it's too hard to make that easily discernable as long as it's fair.Members aren't looking for Operator experience (sic). Members are looking for talks that do not suck.
(sic) is a matter of interpretation, and, you already said the talks suck. The PC said they don't get enough talks. Some of the talks are going to be filler. -M<
Current thread:
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Susan Harris (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution vijay gill (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Randy Bush (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Tony Li (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Brad Knowles (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Tony Li (Jun 20)
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Hannigan, Martin (Jun 20)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)
- RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Gibbard (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Daniel Golding (Jun 21)
- Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution Steve Feldman (Jun 20)