nanog mailing list archives
Re: as numbers
From: Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler () init7 net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:10:34 +0200
Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
While this looks like a lot, it does not really solve any problem. Geoff's numbers show that the pool will expire in 5 years. Our estimate is a little bit longer, but not that much. 2010-2005 is 5 years, if the trend that 20% never appears continues and all these ASN are revoked, this simply means that the pool will expire in 6 years. 2010 or 2011 hardly makes a difference.
Also consider that there will be likely a clearance sale rush, so I expect, unless there is a practical solution, the pool will expire even earlier, 2008 or 2009. Fredy
Current thread:
- as numbers Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- Re: as numbers Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- Re: as numbers Hank Nussbacher (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Henk Uijterwaal (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Randy Bush (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Randy Bush (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Hank Nussbacher (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Randy Bush (Jul 28)
- Re: as numbers Fredy Kuenzler (Jul 29)
- Re: as numbers Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 30)
- Re: as numbers Hank Nussbacher (Jul 30)
- Re: as numbers Joe Abley (Jul 30)
- Re: as numbers Geoff Huston (Jul 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: as numbers Robert Boyle (Jul 30)
- Re: as numbers Joe Abley (Jul 31)
- Re: as numbers Robert Boyle (Jul 31)
- Re: as numbers Daniel Senie (Jul 31)
- Re: as numbers bmanning (Jul 31)
- Re: as numbers Petri Helenius (Jul 31)
- Re: as numbers Joe Abley (Jul 31)