nanog mailing list archives
Re: compromized host list available
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:48:27 -0400
On Jul 21, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:31:13PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote: ...Unless I'm mistaken (and my first report hasn't arrived yet, so maybe Iam) this is more of a "heads up! the following addresses within your network are listed on DNSBLs" than anything else. I can't see why you'd add a disclaimer to a report like that.... The announcement didn't state the intended use - which, given the ingenuity of some, is most reasonable. But there are those who will believe whatever they read, as long as it's in a report, and especially if the report is automatically generated. Must be true, then, eh? A report, eh? And done by one of them infallible computer dinguses, eh?
I don't see why the reliability/reputation of a dnsbl changes the trueness
of "this host is listed in this dnsbl". That is, I agree with Joe :)
Current thread:
- compromized host list available Rick Wesson (Jul 20)
- Re: compromized host list available Joseph S D Yao (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Chris Kuethe (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Joe Abley (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Joseph S D Yao (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available John Payne (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Joseph S D Yao (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Randy Bush (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Joseph S D Yao (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Charles Cala (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Joseph S D Yao (Jul 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: compromized host list available Hannigan, Martin (Jul 21)
- RE: compromized host list available Todd Vierling (Jul 21)
- Re: compromized host list available Rick Wesson (Jul 21)
- RE: compromized host list available Todd Vierling (Jul 21)