nanog mailing list archives
Re: UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:55:50 +0530
On 15/07/05, da Silva, Ronald <ronald.dasilva () twcable com> wrote:
Creation of a new agency for spam and cybercrime issues would be a good idea - this is an issue where iana / icann has no role or mandate, and existing efforts (OECD, London Action Plan, civil society orgs like APCAUCE, industry orgs like MAAWG) are quite fragmented.However, many folks are very cautious about setting up such new agencies under the treaty ladened (and bonding) UN.
What they propose to set up is for regulators to cooperate on spam issues And when it comes to dealing with laws and regulators they make a quite useful worldwide forum -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 14)
- Re: UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 14)
- Re: UN panel fails to agree on how to govern Internet Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 14)