nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:59:47 -0400
FWIW, we did a "Major Protest" at the Rome meeting about Sitefinder and it took Vint months to come to the conclusion that it (interposition on the lookup error semantics) was not just a business decision. I don't know if it is the repeated "ICANN can't be trusted / is corrupt" messaging, or the sensitivity of the .NET "rebid" (aka VGRS deregulation) that got the prompt action -- by VGRS, not the ICANN BoD, but it is more likely the latter (YMMV), so it isn't a sign in itself that ICANN has any more clue today than yesterday. Eric
Current thread:
- ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Elmar K. Bins (Jul 14)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement John Levine (Jul 17)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 17)
- Re: ICANN, VeriSign Will Consider Changes on .net Agreement Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jul 14)