nanog mailing list archives
Re: London incidents
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:08:03 -0400
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 00:19 -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
Indeed it does, but I have to question whether the cellphone decision was well-thought-out. I really can't believe it was.
Are spontaneous "moments notice" decisions ever well-thought-out? Take this scenario away from terrorism and apply it to a presumed pending DoS/Spam attacks of years past. I know of a few m-f (Mon -> Fri, not mother f...) businesses who would shut down corp email servers on the weekend just to avoid problems. Is that a half-baked solution, sure is. Did it help, who knows? What we know is those admins slept well that weekend. :-) -Jim P. (die thread die!)
Current thread:
- Re: London incidents, (continued)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 13)
- Re: London incidents Adam Rothschild (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Scott W Brim (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Todd Vierling (Jul 12)
- "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Matt Ghali (Jul 14)
- Re: "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Thomas Kernen (Jul 15)
- RE: "Leaky Coax" [was: London incidents] Neil J. McRae (Jul 15)
- Re: London incidents Steven J. Sobol (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Jim Popovitch (Jul 13)
- Re: London incidents Steve Sobol (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Michael . Dillon (Jul 12)
- RE: London incidents Neil J. McRae (Jul 14)
- Re: London incidents Joseph S D Yao (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Mark Rogaski (Jul 12)
- Re: London incidents Petri Helenius (Jul 12)