nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 22:55:37 +0300
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Or just send email with IMG SRC tag pointing to a server you control and harvest the addresses from there?What this really does is change the detection method. Instead of scanning randomly, you sit and watch what other IP addresses the local host communicates with (on- and off-subnet), and attack each of them. How many degrees of separation are there really between any two unrelated computers on the Internet? You could probably collect half of all addresses in use just by infecting Google...
Pete
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 04)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Carlos Friacas (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jeroen Massar (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Maimon (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen Sprunk (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Niels Bakker (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 01)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Todd Vierling (Jul 02)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Peter Dambier (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Peter Dambier (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 03)