nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:04:08 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
Who need this complexity? What's wrong with old good _routing rotocol_ approach? Memory? (do not joke, today 4 Gb RAM is not a problem, when it is for slow routing system). CPU (the same)? What else?
TCAMs are expensive and complex. Convergence time is also a problem. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Lesher (Jul 09)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 09)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Michael Loftis (Jul 10)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Eric Rescorla (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 06)