nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:23:03 -1000
Is it a pproblem keeping 500,000 routess in core routers? Of course, it is not (it was in 1996, but it is not in 2005
really? we have not seen this so how do you know? and it will be fine with churn and pushing 300k forwarding entries into the fibs on a well-known vendor's line cards? randy
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 03)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Golding (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 John Payne (Jul 15)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Petri Helenius (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)