nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 21:10:06 +0200
Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Alexei Roudnev wrote:What's the problem with independent address space for every entity (company, family, enterprise) which wants it?It doesn't scale. Regardless of Moore's law, there are some fundamental physical limits that constrain technology.I would contend that is not true. What says that every device inside a company, family, enterprise etc has to be available and reachable by anyone on the planet in a bidirectional fashion as far as session initiation is concerned?
Wasn't that the point of IP-Mobility? Take your one-and-only IP address anywhere you go? -- Andre
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jeroen Massar (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 James (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Nils Ketelsen (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 07)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Brad Knowles (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott McGrath (Jul 08)