nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 23:51:37 -0400
In message <41EC8387-77D2-4F4E-9509-41A3870DA5D8 () muada com>, Iljitsch van Beijn um writes:
On 7-jul-2005, at 0:18, Joe Abley wrote:With great hindsight it would have been nice if the multi6/shim6 design exercise had come *during* the IPv6 design exercise, rather than afterwards: we might have ended up with a protocol/addressing model that accommodated both the address size problem and also the DFZ state bloat issue. Oh well.Well, maybe I'm too optimistic here, but I believe that if a real solution to the DFZ problem presents itself, the IETF will bend over backwards and then some to shoehorn it into IP.
There were people who tried, way back when. We were outvoted... (The situation in the IETF has indeed changed.) --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Alexei Roudnev (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Meyer (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Eric Rescorla (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jul 07)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Joe Abley (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Daniel Roesen (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 David Conrad (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 06)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Sean Doran (Jul 08)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jul 06)
- Message not available
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 06)