nanog mailing list archives
OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:37:35 -0400
<disclaimer> I know this is an email-only question, however the value of the feedback from NANOG is greater than elsewhere, imho. </disclaimer> Should undeliverable email (5.1.1, User unknown) be directed to /dev/null rather than responded to? I was always under the impression that it was nice to respond with a polite message, however these days it seems that 95% of the polite responses are going to 5.1.1 addresses themselves. Tia, -Jim P.
Current thread:
- OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Adi Linden (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Pekka Savola (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)