nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:20:00 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, John Neiberger wrote:
Someone on another list was wondering if this IPv6 exploit might have something to do with the NANOG thread from a few days ago titled "6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America". http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg09747.html Is there any reason to think that these might be related, or do we already know for certain that they're completely unrelated?
I started the 6to4 thread, so.... I personally doubt they're related. I noticed the lack of 6to4 connectivity a couple months ago, and though it to be transient; it appears instead to be an artifact of laziness on the part of v6 network carriers. But, since I love to feed the conspiracy nuts anyway: Maybe the Tier-1s were afraid that the malformed-v6 exploit could somehow be triggered by 6to4 injection and wanted to isolate the v6 network more from the more hostile v4 world. Naaaaaah. My money's on laziness; it's usually the case. 8-) -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>
Current thread:
- Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America John Neiberger (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America Todd Vierling (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America Robert Boyle (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America Todd Vierling (Jul 30)
- Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America Robert Boyle (Jul 29)
- Re: Cisco IPv6 Exploit, was Re: 6to4 routes disappeared from most of North America Todd Vierling (Jul 29)