nanog mailing list archives
Re: 'Whois protection service'
From: Mark Foster <blakjak () blakjak net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:18:26 +1300 (NZDT)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:26:00 +1300, Mark Foster said:I'm unsure how appropriate it is to post anything more specific in the open forum, but i've never seen this before. Whats the deal with hiding a domain name owners true identity?Happens all the time..
*snip*
(They're not *all* bad, evill and black-hat - as far as I can tell, GoDaddy provides a similar service - but if you end up calling them because there's a problem, they're not at all amused - and take their ire out on the problem user) Further discussion is probably better done on spam-l () peach ease lsoft com
Thanks to those who've responded both on and off list - it seems the rules are different on your side of the world. I'll go the other way (as I usually do) and chase the IPs involved (I usually pursue both out of curiosity, but had not seen the aforementioned whois output before). My thanks - can close this thread now before I get moderated. :) Mark.
Current thread:
- 'Whois protection service' Mark Foster (Jan 26)
- Re: 'Whois protection service' Joshua Brady (Jan 26)
- Re: 'Whois protection service' Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: 'Whois protection service' Mark Foster (Jan 26)