nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change?
From: Jan Bacher <jb () jbacher com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:29:07 -0600
JC Dill wrote:
For that reason, I believe that spam-related topics should be discussed on spam-l first, and then the topic should be raised on this list only if you can't find the info or contacts you need on the spam-specific list first.I think the NANOG FAQ should elaborate on this distinction.
From a KISS perspective, what denotes spam is, imho, off-topic for this list.
How to handle spam or the impact of spam is operational and is relevant to this list regardless as to whether it's on spam-l or not.
Current thread:
- Re: Agenda so far for NANOG33 Susan Harris (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Agenda so far for NANOG33 Malayter, Christopher (Jan 03)
- Sunday evening meeting Susan Harris (Jan 03)
- Re: Sunday evening meeting Bill Nash (Jan 03)
- Message not available
- Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Clay Fiske (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? JC Dill (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Steve Atkins (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Jan Bacher (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 04)
- Sunday evening meeting Susan Harris (Jan 03)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Ejay Hire (Jan 04)