nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast 101
From: just me <matt () snark net>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:17:39 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Paul Vixie wrote: i've also been thinking that AXFR's known incoherency could be reduced by using some kind of in-band embargo that would bring a new zone version online synchronously on servers supporting this feature and configured to enable it for a particular zone. Or a different storage abstraction for your zone data. Flat text zone files are so 90's. How about an rdbms backend on each nameserver, with updates delivered 'reliably' by a message queue service. It sounds a lot easier than a bunch of protocol additions. matt ghali --matt () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast 101 just me (Dec 31)
- Re: Anycast 101 Paul Vixie (Jan 01)