![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Terminal Servers (was Re: netblazer Was: baiting)
From: "John Palmer" <nanog () adns net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:53:29 -0600
Netblazers were fine except the Telebit lied about the SYN35 card being usable with a T-1. Bad terminal servers? How about overpriced ones like the USR Total Control Hubs. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert E.Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com> To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner () nic-naa net> Cc: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>; <wsimpson () greendragon com>; <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:10 Subject: Re: netblazer Was: baiting
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner () nic-naa net> writes:In this period of time, the White Knights built the InterOp shownets and we had comparative access to quite a lot of vendor product, and know
that
the red buttons on Wellfleets were correctly positioned on the front,
for
easy access. We used NetBlazers for dial-up outbound (we were
topologically
quite diverse by '91, our last show in the San Jose facility) and I
don't
recall anything ... resembling the behavior that I could characterize as POS like function.My recollection of that show was "T-1 to BARRnet", not bonded-Netblazer-dialout, but I didn't "work the show" until the following spring, so my recollection could be at fault. I wouldn't characterize Netblazers as being particularly cruddy compared to other options available at the time. Remember that this was the era of the Cisco ASM, the Encore/Xylogics Annex (Wellfleet hadn't changed their name to Bay yet, much less bought the Annex product line), some nasty 3com terminal server of which my memory has thankfully purged most details and the gone but not lamented Cisco TRouter. The Netblazers worked pretty darned well when plugged into Telebit modems. Third party modems, well, there were a lot of knobs you could twist, and not the best in the way of documentation on what to do with 'em. Based on my experience with them, I'm quite sure they were fabulous devices capable of being configured in the field to do just about anything, if you had the level of familiarity with their internals that someone who worked QA for them would have had. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Hannigan, Martin (Jan 17)
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 17)
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 19)
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Terminal Servers (was Re: netblazer Was: baiting) John Palmer (Jan 19)
- Re: Terminal Servers (was Re: netblazer Was: baiting) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 19)
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 19)
- Re: netblazer Was: baiting Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: netblazer Was: baiting Hannigan, Martin (Jan 19)