nanog mailing list archives
Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:16:32 +0100
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:11:42PM +0000, Michael.Dillon () radianz com <Michael.Dillon () radianz com> wrote a message of 16 lines which said:
And if you will trust an ISP to deliver port 25 packets then why wouldn't you trust them to deliver email messages?
There are *many* ISP which provide a reasonable job when carrying IP packets but not an acceptable one when relaying email. If it seems a paradox to you, remember that loosing 5 % of the packets still allow users to work while loosing 1 % of the email is unacceptable. If you never met an ISP with a reasonable service for IP packets and a very lousy service for email, then it means we do not live in the same world.
Current thread:
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet, (continued)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 11)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet David Barak (Jan 11)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Jay Hennigan (Jan 11)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Niels Bakker (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Niels Bakker (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Niels Bakker (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 13)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 11)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 12)
- Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet Michael . Dillon (Jan 12)
- fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Chris Adams (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Steven Champeon (Jan 12)
- Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whois not updated yet) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jan 12)