RE: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?

["Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>]

Hi Folks,

It's time to take this thread to SPAM-L or
some other spam oriented list. 

Thanks in advance,

-M<



--
Martin Hannigan                         (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.                          (w) 703-948-7018
Network Engineer IV                       Operations & Infrastructure
hannigan () verisign com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
> just me
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 5:26 PM
> To: Frank Louwers
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Frank Louwers wrote:
>
>   The trick is to config port 587 in such a way that it ONLY accepts
>   smtp-auth mail, not regular smtp.
>   
>   That way, virii/spam junk won't be able to use that port.
>
> What are you, stupid? The spammers have drone armies of machines 
> with completely compromised operating systems. What makes you think 
> that their mail credentials will be hard to obtain?  
>
> matt ghali
>
> --matt () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin><
>               The only thing necessary for the triumph
>               of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke