nanog mailing list archives
RE: NANOG Changes
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:56:50 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Nash [mailto:billn () billn net] Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:53 PM To: Hannigan, Martin Cc: William Allen Simpson; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: NANOG Changes On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:[ snip ]As I was browsing the archive, I noticed my post and his and another one from William Leizon that quoted mine have been removed from it.From what I understand, the archive feature wasn't turned on untiljust before the first post that was actually archived appeared.So, now that archiving is on (for those of us reading the archive instead of subbing to the traffic), can those posts be resubmitted for the sake of posterity?
Bill; Let me correct a mischaracterization. I have nothing to do with any technical or administrative issue on nanog-futures. I'm just a poster like anyone else. As far as the nanog-futures archive goes? You'd think it would be a relatively simple operation to add something that's missing. How about just resending it as a "historical note" and if some person feels really strongly that it must be authenticated, by all means, PGP sign it. -M<
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG Changes, (continued)
- Re: NANOG Changes Michael . Dillon (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Joe Abley (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 20)
- RE: NANOG Changes Bill Nash (Feb 21)