nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:09:00 -0800
Chances are that the Sendmail team doesn't share your worm problems as most of them are not likely running unpatched windows boxes. Owen
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Sean Donelan (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Thor Lancelot Simon (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Thor Lancelot Simon (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Daniel Golding (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jason Frisvold (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 16)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Todd Vierling (Feb 17)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Todd Vierling (Feb 19)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Adrian Chadd (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Thor Lancelot Simon (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Thor Lancelot Simon (Feb 15)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Daniel Senie (Feb 16)