Re: NANOG Changes

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>]

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Gadi Evron wrote:

> Perfect, but let's not repeat past mistakes.
>
> Let's set a date for this "temporary government" to expire, and start
> discussing how the process of a more permanent "governing" body will be
> achieved. I think 3 months is the longest we should decide on (not consider,
> the NANOG community has enough considering to do), we can do it in a month.
>
> I believe this is important enough, either someone who has been here forever
> steps forward and volunteers to get the emails of who people want to see at
> this headache of a position, or we do it openly on the list. A poll can be
> done later on.

something has to be arbitrary in the absence of a government, its a chicken and 
egg. i think you're looking for problems that arent there - do you or anyone 
have issue with the progress thus far? if not the question is moot.

Steve