nanog mailing list archives
Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 27 Dec 2005 01:55:59 +0000
bzs () world std com (Barry Shein) writes:
In my experience you can easily run up $25K in initial filings, just letters going back and forth between both sides' lawyers, no judge or court involved other than it's being filed by a clerk who checks some mechanics (e.g., deadlines), but no one at the court is reading any of it and they sincerely hope they never have to (i.e., that you'll settle out of court, probably because one side ran out of money.)
s/\$25K/$250K/, but otherwise, yes. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin (Dec 25)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 25)
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Barry Shein (Dec 26)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Paul Vixie (Dec 26)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Florian Weimer (Dec 27)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Matthew Sullivan (Dec 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin (Dec 25)
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin (Dec 26)
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin (Dec 26)
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 27)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 27)