nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Qos PipeDream
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:10:20 +0100
* Sean Donelan:
AT&T, Global Crossing, Level3, MCI, Savvis, Sprint, etc have sold QOS services for years. Level3 says 20% of the traffic over its backbone is "better than Best-Effort."
Well, are you sure these traffic classes are actually enforced at the router level? Maybe it's just a difference in the SLA, and the packets are still treated the same across the network.
Internet2 gave up on premium QOS and deployed "less-than Best Effort" scavenger class.
I doubt that utilization on Abilene is high enough for QoS to make any difference. 8-)
Current thread:
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet], (continued)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Chris Woodfield (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Joe Maimon (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Jay Hennigan (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Joe Maimon (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Joe Maimon (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] tony sarendal (Dec 18)
- Message not available
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 16)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Stephen Sprunk (Dec 16)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Sean Donelan (Dec 16)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream Florian Weimer (Dec 16)