nanog mailing list archives

Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path


From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon () NEEBU Net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:06:09 -0700


### On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:18 +0100 (BST), "Stephen J. Wilcox"
### <steve () telecomplete co uk> casually decided to expound upon Abhishek
### Verma <abhishekv.verma () gmail com> the following thoughts about "Re:
### Order of ASes in the BGP Path":

SJW> from time to time people say 'but the rfc says...'. but theres a big
SJW> place for precedent and common practice too.

True... but the latest BGP draft series attempts to address BCP and updates
on 1771.  Typically, the answers sought in light of current BGP practices
can be found in the draft.


--
/*===================[ Jake Khuon <khuon () NEEBU Net> ]======================+
 | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers     /| / [~ [~ |) | | --------------- |
 | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation  / |/  [_ [_ |) |_| N E T W O R K S |
 +=========================================================================*/


Current thread: