nanog mailing list archives
Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come?
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:18:00 +0200
On 23-aug-2005, at 23:55, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
This is exactly why people shouldn't implement drafts except possibly as a private in-house feasibility study.
In general, you're right; however, BGP documents have a special status. Because of how crucial BGP is to the Internet's functioning, I-Ds won'tprogress to RFC status (at least as Proposed Standard) without two interoperating implementations.
Ah, that makes sense. So how does that work for work on TCP (which is even more crucial than BGP)? You have to have interoperable implementations before writing the draft?
(I knew the IETF had some trouble with its internal organization. I had no idea it was this bad.)
Current thread:
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come?, (continued)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? bmanning (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Yakov Rekhter (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Paul Jakma (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Andre Oppermann (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Yakov Rekhter (Aug 23)
- RE: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Paul Jakma (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 23)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Daniel Golding (Aug 24)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Yakov Rekhter (Aug 24)
- Re: 4-Byte AS Number soon to come? Paul Jakma (Aug 24)