nanog mailing list archives
Re: as numbers
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:15:15 +0100 (BST)
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Geoff Huston wrote:
So - to NANOG at large - if you want your vendor to include 4-Byte AS support in their BGP code anytime soon, in order to avoid some last minute panic in a couple of years hence, then it would appear that you should talk to them now and say clearly that you want 4-Byte AS support in your BGP software right now.
Geoff, excellent idea.. before I forward this email to my suppliers tho, is there a reference I can send.. excuse my ignorance but I'm not familiar with research done on 4-byte ASNs, is there a proposed standard implementation? If I have something definite to request I will immediately send those emails, Steve
Current thread:
- Re: as numbers Daniel Karrenberg (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers bmanning (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: as numbers Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers Joe Abley (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: as numbers Geoff Huston (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers william(at)elan.net (Aug 01)
- Re: as numbers Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Aug 01)