nanog mailing list archives
Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 19:48:57 +0200
* Pete Templin:
Non-scientific test, but I've seen new prefixes appear at the Oregon-IX route server in <20 seconds (we're only in Texas), and reach a modestly steady state in <90 seconds. I've seen adjustments (prepending, etc.) appear in 45+ seconds, and withdraws in probably the same time.
The is the mere propagation delay, and it's reasonable to expect it to be in this range. Unless you botch something, the route flaps a couple of times, and the prefix is dampened. 8-> There might be some delays because prefix filters aren't updated in real time, even if they are automatically generated from RPSL snippets. I don't know if this makes a difference in the real world, though. If IANA assigned the surrounding /8 to the RIR just a couple of weeks ago, you might run into some static access or prefix lists. To get a global picture, I think you'd have to ask the GRADUS folks. RIPE RIS is interesting, too, of course.
Current thread:
- Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Scott Weeks (Aug 19)
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Jeroen Massar (Aug 19)
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Pete Templin (Aug 19)
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Florian Weimer (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Scott Weeks (Aug 19)
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Scott Weeks (Aug 19)
- Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP Scott Weeks (Aug 24)