nanog mailing list archives

Re: zotob - blocking tcp/445


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:31:56 +0000 (GMT)



On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:



On 8/15/05 4:46 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:


I'm not nearly confident enough to decide on behalf of almost
billion other people how they should benefit from the Internet
and how not to.
thanks for that!
Indeed.  Also see
http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/2003-10-18-edge-filters.html

as i just replied to a private message from an enterprise op,

  o backbone isps can not set their customers' security policy
    - some customers want to run billyware shares over the wan
      whether we advise it or not
    - some of us host security researchers, who have a taste
      for 445 and other nasty traffic


While its not uncommon to run SMB/Windows file system drive mounts across
private WANs, doing so across the Internet, on a non-encrypted tunnel, is
the equivalent of running with scissors.

no one was arguing that... just like no one argues that riding a
motorcycle sans-helmet is stupid (or playing hockey without a helmet)


I am unaware of any enterprise security folks foolish enough to allow that.
Of course, I may be sheltered.

'enterprise security folks' are probably not the issue... The fact remains
that lots of folks DO do this :( There are quite a few folks between
'consumer' and 'enterprise' that do all manner of dumb things on the
Internet  (where 'dumb' is equivalent to running smb shares across the
public network minus encryption/ipsec). It's their choice to do that, and
their network providers are expected/demanded to pass those packets for
them.

-Chris


Current thread: